Why A Name Change Is Vital

By: Judge Anna von Reitz.

It is apparent that a lot of people are confused about the name change issue.
.
All you are doing is a perfectly routine adult name change.  Nothing fancy.  Nothing hard.  No arcane procedures.  No Voo-Doo.  Nothing.  Just a plain old name change in state magistrate level court.
.
You are changing the “style” of your name from all capital letters like this: JOHN MICHAEL DOE to upper and lower case form like this: John Michael Doe.
.
Why are you doing this?  The only explanation to the court is that you want your name to be expressed in its grammatically correct form.  JOHN MICHAEL DOE is not a proper name in English. Period.
.
There isn’t a judge on the planet competent to argue otherwise.
.
In fact, if he or she attempts to argue it, you pull out your sturdy copy of The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, turn to Foreign Languages, Section 11:147 and the description of Glossa and American Sign Language.  Put that under their nose and tell them to take a deep sniff of the corruption.
.
So — what are you doing besides choosing to use proper grammar?
.
You are taking the first step to reverse a fraud that is now 75 years in the making.
.
Your name styled in upper and lower case like this: John Michael Doe —- is your Trade Name. Your parents chose your first and second name and gave it to you as a gift and the surname (last name) you inherited from your family.  It is your property and you are its Holder in Due Course on the land jurisdiction of the United States.
.
However, back in 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his Administration committed fraud and treason against you and your government and pulled off the biggest con job ever.  Roosevelt was “President” of a bankrupt corporation operating as the United States of America, Inc.  The Governors operating under him were operating “state franchises” of this same corporation—- the State of Ohio, Inc., the State of Michigan, Inc. and so on.
.
So FDR went to his franchisees and together they hatched a plan.  They would simply and secretively redefine your honest Trade Name as the identically styled name of a Foreign Situs Trust.
.
Foreign Situs Trusts are named using the same conventions as your Trade Name.  Just looking at them without other reference, the Trade Name “John Michael Doe” looks the same as the Foreign Situs Trust name “John Michael Doe”.
.
So Roosevelt and his cronies created millions of Foreign Situs Trusts named after living Americans and claimed that those Foreign Situs Trusts were all “franchises” of the bankrupt parent corporation standing as “sureties” for its debts.
.
In this way a deliberate confusion was created—a Grand Con based on deceptively and identically similar names.
.
Your good Trade Name on the land jurisdiction appeared to be the name of a Foreign Situs Trust operating instead in the international jurisdiction of the sea.  Under this false pretense your Name and Estate were pulled into the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc. as a presumed surety and franchise of this bankrupt parent corporation.
.
Once that bankruptcy was over, your Trade Name was still confused with the name of their “discharged” Foreign Situs Trust and still left drifting around in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea—-though no longer subject to any clams from creditors.
.
So? What do you need to do?  You need to beat feet for your home port and re-flag the Ship of State.
.
Changing your name from the ACCOUNT to the Proper English signals the fact that you are alive.  Accepting, Acknowledging, and Re-Conveying it as your Trade Name to the land jurisdiction precludes any idea that your estate or your state of the Union is “abandoned property”.
.
Get going and do it now.  As soon as you have your name change decree, draft your “Deed of Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-conveyance Without Consideration” and record it with the local Land Recorder’s Office.
.
It’s no big deal.  Simply a statement such as— “Today, (the effective date of the name change decree) I have received back my Trade Name and I do acknowledge, accept, and re-convey it to Lawful Jurisdiction on the land and soil of its birth  and return it to its native domicile known as the (wisconsin, ohio, texas, etc.) state and do place this Deed upon the Public Record in token of my action.”
.
Sign, date, record.
.
Then take a certified copy of this recorded Deed and make a simple “Notice of Deed” as a cover sheet and return it back to the Court.
.
Again, it’s just a one-liner: “I, John Michael Doe, have acknowledged and accepted and re-conveyed my Trade Name as shown by the certified copy of the enclosed recorded Deed returned to the case file.”
.
Have the Clerk sign a copy of the Notice, date stamped, received.  Take that and record it as an “Extension” to the Deed of Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-Conveyance Without Consideration.
.
You now have your own name back under your control on the land jurisdiction and nobody can say otherwise.
.
One of the Red Flags we encountered was that nobody had to show any ID in order to change their name.  No Birth Certificates.  No DLs.  No Passports.  Nothing.  You could, apparently, adopt anyone’s name.  I could have claimed to be Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis and I don’t think that judge would have cared.
.
The same is true of the ACCOUNT sign-language NAME.  When we checked Doing Business Names none of our ACCOUNTS were claimed, either. So, having returned our Trade Name officially to our possession and to our lawful jurisdiction after decades of abuse, the next job is to seize control of the ACCOUNT NAMES.
.
Sooner or later, with enough complaints and enough awareness, this will have to be done en masse via political action instead of individual court and recording processes.  Until then, the surreptitious fraud and pillaging and mischaracterization and false claims of “abandonment” continue.  You now have a pathway pioneered and cleared for you to reclaim your natural estate and to return your identity to your own control and to your natural jurisdiction on the land.
.
Don’t wait.  Do it now.  It isn’t difficult.  It costs between $100 and $150 in most states.  Recording fees might be another $150.  But once it’s done, you have your Good Name back in your control and you are standing on the land and nobody can say otherwise.
.
This is the foundation needed to reclaim the ACCOUNTS and all else that is yours— your claim to be the General Executor of your own Estate.

Read More

Licensing Liberty

“No state shall convert a right (liberty) into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)

“If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)

 

Read More

The U.C.C. Connection

FOREWORD

This is a slightly condensed, casually paraphrased transcript of tapes of a seminar given in 1990 by Howard Freeman. It was prepared to make available the knowledge and experience of Mr. Freeman in his search for an accessible and understandable explanation of the confusing state of the government and the courts. It should be helpful to those who may have difficulty learning from such lectures, or those who want to develop a deeper understanding of this information without having to listen to three or four hours of recorded material.

The frustration many Americans feel about our judicial system can be overwhelming and often frightening; and like most fear, eventually, with the seemingly tyrannical power of some governmental agency and the mystifying and awesome power of the courts. We have been taught that we must "get a good lawyer," but that is becoming increasingly difficult, if not impossible. If we are defending ourselves from the government, we find that the lawyers quickly take our money, and then tell us as the ship is sinking, "I can't help you with that - I'm an officer of the court."

Ultimately, the only way for us to have even a "snowball's chance …" is to understand the RULES OF THE GAME, and to come to an understanding of the true nature of the Law. The attorney lawyers have established and secured a virtual monopoly over this area of human knowledge by implying that the subject is just too difficult for the average person to understand, and by creating a separate vocabulary out of English words of otherwise common usage. While it may, at times, seem hopelessly complicated, it is not that difficult to grasp - are lawyers really as smart as they would have us believe? Besides, anyone who has been through a legal battle against the government with the aid of a lawyer has come to realize that lawyers learn about procedure, not about law. Mr. Freeman admits that he is not a lawyer, and as much, he has a way of explaining law to us that puts it well within our reach. Consider also that the framers of the Constitution wrote in language simple enough that the people could understand, specifically so that it would not have to be interpreted.

So again we find, as in many other areas of life, that "THE BUCK STOPS HERE!" It is we who must take the responsibility for finding and putting to good use the TRUTH. It is we who must claim and defend our God-given rights and our freedom from those who would take from us. It is we who must protect ourselves, our families and our posterity from the inevitable intrusion into our lives by those who live parasitically off the labor, skill and talents of others.

To these ends, Mr. Freeman offers a simple, hopeful explanation of our plight and a peaceful method of dealing with it. Please take note that this lecture represents one chapter in the book of his understanding, which he is always refining, expanding, improving. It is, as all bits of wisdom are, a point of departure from which to begin our own journey into understanding, that we all might be able to pass on to others; greater knowledge and hope, and to God: the gift of lives in peace, freedom and praise.

"I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, be wise as a serpent and harmless as a dove."

INTRODUCTION

I was asked to testify in a tax case as an expert witness. After many days of preparation, I felt confident of my research. I spent over 30 minutes presenting many Supreme Court decisions that supported the defendant's position. The prosecution concluded his statements, and to my amazement, the judge told the jury that they could only consider certain facts, none of which were the facts I had given.

As soon as the trial was over I went around to the judge's office and he was just coming in through his back door. I said, "Judge, by what authority do you overturn the standing decisions of the United States Supreme Court. You sat on the bench while I read that case law. Now how do you, a District Judge, have authority to overturn decisions of the Supreme Court?" He says. "Oh, those were old decisions." I said, "Those are standing decisions. They have never been overturned. I don't care how old they are; you have no right to overturn a standing decision of the United States Supreme Court in a District Court."

PUBLIC LAW V. PUBLIC POLICY

He said, "Name any decision of the Supreme Court after 1938 and I'll honor it, but all the decision you read were prior to 1938, and I don't honor those decisions." I asked what happened in 1938. He said, "Prior to 1938, the Supreme Court was dealing with Public Law; since 1938, the Supreme Court has dealt with Public Policy. The charge that Mr. S. was being tried for is a Public Policy Statute, not Public Law, and those Supreme Court cases do not apply to Public Policy." I asked him what happened in 1938? He said that he had already told me too much - he wasn't going to tell me any more.

1938 AND THE ERIE RAILROAD

Well, I began to investigate. I found that 1938 was the year of the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins case of the Supreme Court. It was also the year the courts claim they blended Law with Equity. I read the Erie Railroad case. A man had sued the Erie Railroad for damages when he was struck by a board sticking out of a boxcar as he walked along beside the tracks. The district court had decided on the basis of Commercial (Negotiable Instruments) Law: that this man was not under any contract with the Erie Railroad, and therefore he had no standing to sue the company. Under the Common Law, he was damaged and he would have had the right to sue.

This overturned a standing decision of over one hundred years. Swift v. Tyson in 1840 was a similar case, and the decision of the Supreme Court was that in any case of this type, the court would judge the case on the Common Law of the state where the incident occurred - in this case Pennsylvania. But in the Erie Railroad case, the Supreme Court ruled that all federal cases will be judged under the Negotiable Instruments Law. There would be no more decisions based on the Common Law at the federal level. So here we find the blending of Law with Equity.

This was a puzzle to me. As I put these new pieces together, I determined that all our courts since 1938 were Merchant Law courts and not Common Law courts. There were still some pieces of the puzzle missing.

A FRIEND IN THE COURT

Fortunately, I made a friend of a judge. Now you won't make friends with a judge if you go into court like a "wolf in black sheep country." You must approach him as though you are the sheep and he is the wolf. If you go into court as a wolf, you make demands and tell the judge what the law is - how he had better uphold the law or else. Remember the verse: I send you out as sheep in wolf country; be wise as a serpent and harmless as a dove. We have to go into court and be wise and harmless, and not make demands. We must play a little dumb and ask a lot of questions. Well, I asked a lot of questions and boxed the judges into a corner where they had to give me a victory or admit what they didn't want to admit. I won the case, and on the way out I had to stop by the clerk's office to get some papers. One of the judges stopped and said, "You're an interesting man, Mr. Freeman. If you're ever in town, stop by, and if I'm not sitting on a case we will visit."

AMERICA IS BANKRUPT

Later, when I went to visit the judge, I told him of my problem with the Supreme Court cases dealing with Public Policy rather than the Public Law. He said, "In 1938, all the higher judges, the top attorneys and the U.S. attorneys were called into a secret meeting and this is what we were told:

America is a bankrupt nation - it is owned completely by its creditors. The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the state governments.

Take silent judicial notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly. Your court is operating in an Admiralty Jurisdiction - call it anything you want, but do not call it Admiralty."

ADMIRALTY COURTS

The reason they cannot call it Admiralty Jurisdiction is that your defense would be quite different in Admiralty Jurisdiction from your defense under the Common Law. In Admiralty, there is no court which has jurisdiction unless there is a valid international contract in dispute. If you know it is Admiralty Jurisdiction, and they have admitted on the record that you are in Admiralty Court, you can demand that the international maritime contract, to which you are supposedly a party, and which you supposedly have breached, be placed into evidence.

No court has Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction unless there is a valid international maritime contract that has been breached.

So you say, just innocently like a lamb,“Well, I didn't know that I got involved with an international maritime contract, so, in good faith, I deny that such a contract exists. If this court is taking jurisdiction in Admiralty, then, pursuant to section 3-501 of your UCC, (Presentment), the prosecutor will have no difficulty placing the [alleged] contract into evidence, so that I may examine and [possibly] challenge the validity of the contract.”

What they would have to do is place the national debt into evidence. They would have to admit that the international bankers own the whole nation, and that we are their slaves.

NOT EXPEDIENT

But the bankers said it is not expedient at this time to admit that they own everything and could foreclose on every nation of the world. The reason they don't want to tell everyone that they own everything is that there are still too many privately owned guns. There are uncooperative armies and other military forces. So until they can gradually consolidate all armies into a WORLD ARMY and all courts into a single WORLD COURT, it is not expedient to admit the jurisdiction the courts are operating under. When we understand these things, we realize that there are certain secrets they don't want to admit, and we can use this to our benefit.

JURISDICTION

The Constitution of the United States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may operate:

Common Law

Common Law is based on God's law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself. For instance, when you cross over the state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, "BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS - IT'S THE LAW." This cannot be Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But Common Law cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT, and is punishable.

Equity Law

Equity Law is law which compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. So, if you have compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation of the contract. Now this can only be a civil action - not criminal. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried criminally, but you can be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If you then refuse to perform as directed by the court, you can be charged with contempt of court, which is a criminal action. Are our seatbelt laws, Equity Laws? No, they are not, because you cannot be penalized or punished for not keeping to the letter of a contract.

Admiralty/Maritime Laws

This is civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adhering to the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see what jurisdiction the seatbelt laws (all traffic codes, etc) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/Maritime Law and there must be a valid international contract in force.

However, the courts don't want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdictions, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That is what the Supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case - that the decisions will be based on commercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since they were instructed not to call it, Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.

COURTS OF CONTRACT

You must ask how we got into this situation where we can be charged with failure to wear seatbelts and be fined for it. Isn't the judge sworn to up hold the Constitution? Yes, he is. But you must understand the Constitution, in Article I, § 10, gives us the unlimited right to contract, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty or property of someone else. Contracts are enforceable, and the Constitution gives two jurisdictions where contracts can be enforced - Equity or Admiralty. But we find them being in Statutory Jurisdiction. This is the embarrassing part for the courts, but we can use this to box the judges into a corner in their own courts. We will cover this more later.

CONTRACTS MUST BE VOLUNTARY

Under the Common Law, every contract must be enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally by both parties or it is void and enforceable. These are characteristic -it must be based on substance. For example, contracts used to read, "For one dollar and other valuable considerations, I will paint your house, etc." That was a valid contract - the dollar was a genuine, silver dollar. Now, suppose you wrote a contract that said, "For one Federal Reserve Note and other considerations, I will paint your house...." And suppose, for example, I painted your house the wrong color. Could you go into a Common Law court and get justice? No, you could not. You see, a Federal Reserve Note is a "colorable"1 dollar, as it has no substance, and in a Common Law Jurisdiction, that contract would be unenforceable.

colorABLE MONEY - colorABLE COURTS

The word "colorable" means something that appears to be genuine, but is not. Maybe it looks like a dollar, and maybe it spends like a dollar, but if it is not redeemable for lawful money (silver or gold) it is "colorable." If a Federal Reserve Note is used in a contract, then the contract becomes a "colorable" contract. And "colorable" contracts must be enforced under a "colorable" jurisdiction. So by creating Federal Reserve Notes, the government had to create a jurisdiction to cover the kinds of contracts which use them. We now have what is called Statutory Jurisdiction, which is not a genuine Admiralty jurisdiction.

1 colorable: That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned have the appearance of truth. - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

It is "colorable" Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing because we are using "colorable money." Colorable Admiralty is now known as Statutory Jurisdiction. Let's see how we got under this Statutory Jurisdiction.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE

The government set up a "colorable" law system to fit the "colorable" currency. It used to be called the Law Merchant or the Law of redeemable Instruments, because it dealt with paper which was redeemable in something of substance. But, once Federal Reserve Notes had become unredeemable, there had to be a system of law which was completely "colorable" from start to finish. this system of law was codified as the Uniform Commercial Code , and has been adopted in every state. This is "colorable" law, and it is used in all the courts.

I explained one of the keys earlier, which is that the country is bankrupt and we have no rights. If the master says "Jump!" then the slave had better jump, because the master has the right to cut off his head. As slaves we have no rights. But the creditors/masters had to cover that up, so they created a system of law called the Uniform Commercial Code. This "colorable" jurisdiction under the Uniform Commercial Code is the next key to understanding what happened.

CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT

One difference between Common Law and the Uniform Commercial Code is that in Common Law, contracts must be entered into (1) knowingly, (2) voluntarily, and (3) intentionally.

Under the U.C.C., this is not so. First of all, contracts are unnecessary. Under this new law, "agreements" can be binding, and if you only exercise the benefits of an "agreements," it is presumed or implied that you intend to meet the obligations associated with those benefits. If you accept a benefit offered by government, then you are obligated to follow, to the letter, each and every statute involved with that benefit. The method has been to get everyone exercising a benefit , and they don't even have to tell the people what the benefit is. Some people think it is the driver's license, the marriage license or the birth certificate, etc. I believe it is none of these.

COMPELLED BENEFIT

I believe the benefit being used is that we have been given the privilege of discharging debt with limited liability, instead of paying debt. When we pay a debt, we give substance for substance. If I buy a quart of milk with a silver dollar, that dollar bought the milk, and the milk bought the dollar - substance for substance. But if I use a Federal Reserve Note to buy the milk, I have not paid for it. There is no substance in the Federal Reserve Note. It is worthless paper given in exchange for something of substantive value. Congress offers us this benefit :

Debt money, created by the federal United States, can be spent all over the United States of America, it will be legal tender for all debts, public and private, and the limited liability is that you cannot be sued for not paying your debt.

So now they have said, "We going to help you out, and you can just discharge your debts instead of paying your debts." When we use this "colorable" money to discharge our debts, we cannot use a Common Law court. We can only use a "colorable" court. We are completely under the UCC, using non-redeemable negotiable instruments and we are discharging debt rather than paying debt.

REMEDY AND RECOURSE

Every system of civilized law must have two characteristics: Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way to get out from under that law, and you recover your loss. The Common Law, the Law Merchants, and even the Uniform Commercial Code all have remedy and recourse, but for a long time we could not find them. If you go to a law library and ask to see the Uniform Commercial Code, they will show you a shelf of books completely filled with the Uniform Commercial Code. When you pick up one volume and start to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally written to be confusing. It took us a long time to discover where the Remedy and Recourse are found in their UCC. They are found right in the first volume, at 1-308 (old 1-207) and 1-103.

REMEDY

The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel. (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).7)

It is important to remember when we go into a court that we are in a commercial international jurisdiction. If we go into court and say, "I DEMAND MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS," the judge will most likely say, "You mention the Constitution again, and I'll find you in contempt of court!" Then we don't understand how he can do that. Hasn't he sworn to uphold the Constitution? The rule here is: you cannot be charged under one jurisdiction, and defend under another. For example, if the French government came to you and asked where you filed your French income tax in a certain year, do you go to the French government and say, "I demand my Constitutional Right?" No. The proper answer is: THE LAW DOESN'T APPLY TO ME - I'M NOT A FRENCHMAN. You must make your reservation of rights under the jurisdiction in which you are charged - not under some other jurisdiction. So in a UCC court, you must claim your reservation of rights under (pursuant to) the [their] U.C.C. 1-308 (old 1-207).

UCC 1-308 (old 1-207) goes on to say:

When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date . (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).9)

You have to make your claim known early. Further, it says:

The Sufficiency of the Reservation - Any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as "WITHOUT PREJUDICE." (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).4)

Whenever you sign any legal paper that deals with Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) -in any way, shape or manner - under your signature write: Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 (old 1-207). This reserves your rights. You can show, at 1-308 (old 1-207).4 that you have sufficiently reserved your rights.

It is very important to understand just what this means. For example, one man who used this in regard to a traffic ticket was asked by the judge just what he meant by writing "without prejudice UCC 1-308 (old 1-207)" on his statement to the court. He had not tried to understand the concepts involved. He only wanted to use it to get out of the ticket. He did not know what it meant. When the judge asked him what he meant by signing in that way, he told the judge that he was not prejudiced against anyone .... The judge knew that the man had no idea what it meant, and fined him an additional $25.00 for a frivolous defense. You must know what it means.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

pursuant to UCC 1-308

When you see "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-308 in connection with your signature, you are saying:

"I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement or bankruptcy that I did not enter knowingly , voluntarily , and intentionally . And furthermore, I do not and will not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement or bankruptcy."

Actually, it is better to use a rubber stamp, because this demonstrates that you had previously reserved your rights. The simple fact that it takes several days or a week to order and get a stamp shows that you had reserved your rights before signing the document.

What is the compelled performance of an unrevealed commercial agreement? When you use Federal Reserve Notes instead of silver dollars, is it voluntary? No. There is no lawful money , so you have to use Federal Reserve Notes - you have to accept the benefit. the government has given you the benefit to discharge your debts with limited liability, and you don't have to pay your debts.

How nice they are! But if you did not reserve your rights under 1-308 (old 1-207).7, you are compelled to accept the benefit, and are therefore obligated to obey every statute , ordinance and regulation of the government, at all levels of government - federal, state and local.

If you understand this, you will be asked to explain it to the judge when asks. And he will ask, so be prepared to explain it to the court. You will also need to understand UCC 1-103 - the argument and recourse.

If you want to understand this fully, go to a law library and photocopy these two sections from the UCC. It is important to get the Anderson [Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code, Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company] edition. Some of the law libraries will only have the West Publishing version, and it is very difficult to understand. In Anderson, it is broken down with decimals into ten parts, and most importantly, it is written in plain English.

RECOURSE

The Recourse appears in the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-103.6, which says:

The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force , except where displaced by the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law.

This is the argument we use in court:

The Code recognizes the Common Law. If it did not recognize the Common Law, the government would have had to admit that the United States is bankrupt, and is completely owned by its creditors. But, it is not expedient to admit this, so the Code was written so as not to abolish the Common Law entirely.

Therefore, if you have made a sufficient, timely, and explicit reservation of your rights at 1-308 (old 1-207), you may then insist that the statutes be construed in harmony with the Common Law.

If the charge is a traffic, you may demand that the court produce the injured person who has filed a verified complaint. If, for example, you were charged with failure to buckle your seatbelt , you may ask the court who was injured as a result of your failure to "buckle up."

However, if the judge won't listen to you and just moves ahead with the case, then you will want to read to him that last sentence of 1-103.6 which states:

The Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law action.

Tell the judge:

"Your Honor, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my right under the Uniform Commercial Code." I have a remedy, under the, UCC to reserve my rights under the Common Law. I have exercised the remedy, and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law, you must come forth with the damaged party."

If the judge insists on proceeding with the case, just act confused and ask this question: 

"Let me see if I understand, Your Honor. Has this court made a judicial determination that the sections 1-308 (old 1-207) and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the system of law you are operating under, are not valid law before this court?"

Now the judge is in a jamb! How can the court throw out one part of the Code and uphold another? If he answers, "yes," then you say: 

"I put this court on notice that I am appealing your judicial determination."

Of course, the higher court will uphold the Code on appeal. The judge knows this, so once again you have boxed him into a corner.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION - TRAFFIC COURT

Just so we can understand how this whole process works, let us look at a court situation such as a traffic violation. Assume you ran through a yellow light and a policeman gave you a traffic ticket.

1. The first thing you want to do is to delay the action at least three weeks. This you can do by being pleasant and cooperative with the officer. Explain to him that you are very busy and ask if he could please set your court appearance for about three weeks away.

[At this point we need to remember the government's trick: "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you." Now we want to use this approach with them).

2. The next step is to go the clerk of the traffic court and say:

"I believe it would be helpful if I talk to you, because I want to save the government some money (this will get their attention). I am undoubtedly going to appeal this case. As you know, in an appeal, I have to have a transcript, but the traffic court doesn't have a court reporter. It would be a waste of taxpayer's money to run me through this court and then to have to give me a trial de novo in a court of record. I do need a transcript for appealing, and to save the government some money, maybe you could schedule me to appear in a court of record."

You can show the date on the ticket and the clerk will usually agree that there is plenty of time to schedule your trial for a court of record. Now your first appearance is in a court of record and not in a traffic court, where there is no record.

3. When you get into court, the judge will read the charges: driving through a yellow light or whatever, and this is a violation of ordinance XYZ. He will ask, " Do you understand the charges against you ?"

4. It is very important to get it read into the record, that you do not understand the charges. With that in the record, the court cannot move forward to judge the facts. This will be answered later.

5. "Well, Your Honor, there is a question I would like to ask before I can make a plea of innocent or guilty. I think it could be answered if I could put the officer on the stand for a moment and ask him a few short questions."

Judge: "I don't see why not. Let's swear the officer in and have him take the stand." 

"Is this the instrument that you gave me?" (Handing him the traffic citation).

Officer: "Yes, this is a copy of it. The judge has the other portion of it."

"Where did you get my address that you wrote on that citation?"

Officer: "Well, I got it from your driver's license."

(Handing the officer your driver's license) "Is this the document you copied my name and address from?"

Officer: "Yes, this is where I got it."

"While you've got it in your hand, would you read the signature that's on that license?"

(The officer reads the signature). "While you're there, would you read into the record what it says under the signature?"

Officer: "It says, 'Without Prejudice, UCC 1-308.'" [old 1-207]

Judge: "Let me see that license!" (He looks at it turns to the officer). "You didn't notice this printing under the signature on this license, when you copied his name and address onto the ticket?"

Officer: "Oh, no, I was just getting the address - I didn't look down there."

Judge: "You're not very observant as an officer. Therefore, I'm afraid I cannot accept your testimony in regards to the facts of this case. This case is dismissed."

6.a. you had reserved your Common Law rights under the UCC;

b. you had done it sufficiently by writing "Without Prejudice, UCC 1-308 (old 1-207)" on your driver's license;

c. the statute would now have to be read on harmony with the Common Law, and the Common Law says the statute exists, but there is no injured party; and

d. since there is no injured party or complaining witness, the court has no jurisdiction under the Common Law.

5. If the judge tries to move ahead and try the facts of the case, then you will want to ask him the following question:

"Your Honor, let me understand this correctly, has the court made a judicial determination that it has authority under the jurisdiction that it is operating under, to ignore two sections of the Uniform Commercial Code which have been called to its attention? If he says, yes, tell him that you put the court on notice that you will appeal that judicial determination, and that if you are damaged by his actions, you will sue him in Common Law action - under the jurisdiction of the U.C.C."

QUESTIONS AND REVIEW

Note: These are some of the questions asked after the main lecture. Some are restatements of material presented earlier, but they contain very valuable information which is worth repeating.

COURTROOM TECHNIQUES

Question: How did you "box in" the judge?

This is easy to do if you don't know too much. I didn't know too much, but I boxed them in. You must play a little ignorant.

If you are arrested and you go to court, just remember that in a criminal action, you have to understand the law or it is a reversible error for the court to try you. If you don't understand the law, they can't try you.

In any traffic court case or tax case you are called into court and the judge reads the law and then asks,

"Do you understand the charges?"

Defendant: "No, (Your Honor,) I do not!"

Judge: "Well, what's so difficult about that charge? Either you drove the wrong way on a one-way street or you didn't. You can only go one way on that street, and if you go the other way, it's a fifty dollar fine. What's so difficult about this that you don't understand?"

D: "Well, Your Honor, it's not the letter of the law, but rather the nature of the law that I don't understand. The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution gives me the right to request the court to explain the nature of any action against me, and upon my request, the court has the duty to answer. I have a question about the nature of this action."

J: "Well, what is that - what do you want to know?"

Always! Ask them some easy questions first, as this establishes that they are answering. You ask:

D: "Well, Your Honor, is this a Civil or Criminal Action?"

J: "It is criminal." (If it were a civil action there could be no fine, so it has to be criminal).

D: "Thank you, Your Honor, for telling me that. Then the record will show that this action against ___(Straw Man Name)___ is a criminal action, is that right?"

J: "Yes."

D: "I would like to ask another question about this criminal action. There are two criminal jurisdictions mentioned in the Constitution; one is under the Common Law , and the other deals with International Maritime Contracts , under an Admiralty Jurisdiction . Equity is Civil, and you said this is a Criminal action, so it seems it would have to be under either the Common Law, or Maritime Law. But what puzzles me, Your Honor, is, there is no Corpus Delicti here that gives this court a jurisdiction over my person and property under the Common Law. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that this court is moving under the Common Law."

J: "No, I can assure you this court is not moving under the Common Law."

D: "Well, thank you, your Honor, but now you make the charge against me even more difficult to understand, the only other criminal jurisdiction would apply only if there was an International Maritime Contract involved and I was a party to it, it had been Breached, and the court was operating in an Admiralty Jurisdiction.

I don't believe I have ever been under any International Maritime Contract, so I would deny that one exists. I would have to demand that such a contract, if it does exist, be placed into evidence, so that I may contest it, but surely, this court is not operating under an Admiralty Jurisdiction."

You just put words in the judge's mouth.

J: "No, I can assure you, we're not operating under an Admiralty Jurisdiction. We're not out in the ocean somewhere - we're right here in the middle of the State of North Carolina, No, this is not an Admiralty Jurisdiction."

D: "Thank you, Your Honor, but now I am more puzzled than ever. If this/these charge/s is/are not under the Common Law, or under Admiralty - and those are the only criminal jurisdictions mentioned in the Constitution - what kind of jurisdiction could this court be operating under?"

J: "It's Statutory Jurisdiction."

D: "Oh, thank you, Your Honor. I'm glad you told me that. But I have never heard of that jurisdiction. So, if I have to defend under that, I would need to have the Rules of Criminal Procedure for Statutory Jurisdiction. Can you provide me with the location of a copy?"

THE END! 

 

Read More

Claim Your Babies Now — Stop The Crime At The Source

By: Anna: von Reitz ...

I got an urgent call today, a young man whose wife is in labor. Thanks to the wonders of ultrasound they have known for some time that she is carrying a son.

My advice in this day and age there is no excuse for being caught napping on this issue. Pick out a name for your baby BEFORE they are born and record their Trade Name by publication in the local papers or by recording it with the local Land Recorder’s Office prior to them being born. It can be a very simple little Notice:

The living Coloradan joe leroy doe known by the Trade Name Joe Leroy Doe and his wife Melissa Ann Doe a native of Massachusetts both currently living in Red Rocks, Colorado, announce that they have created a new life whose Trade Name shall be Brandon Craig Doe and they claim their new creation as their true-born son, heir, and dependent. They jointly agree to emancipate him automatically when he reaches the age of eighteen and declare before all men and nations that he is otherwise subject only to God.

When the rats come to you in the hospital and try to force you to sign paperwork signing your babies over to them and making them your “presumed trustees” in charge of managing the “property” tell them that they are attempting to kidnap your son and that you won’t tolerate it. If they protest that it is “the law” observe that it may be THEIR law, but it certainly isn’t yours. Look them right in the eye and calmly say, “I am a living beneficiary of the colorado trust and I am not consenting.” Have a voice recorder ready and tape them if they threaten you. If they keep on, say, “It is a capital level offense– a hanging crime– to mischaracterize an unarmed non-combatant, so unless you are claiming that i or my son have offered to harm anyone, you need to stand down. Now.” Be polite, uncompromising, and most of all— prepared. And if they make any threats, don’t hesitate to call in friends, family, newspaper reporters, clergymen, members of the Grand Jury and other members of the community. If they threaten violence put down any false name you like on the paperwork and cross out any terms such as “Informant” or “applicant” you don’t like.

Since they are trying to name a non-existent “person” after your baby, give them a non-existent name to go with it.

Smile prettily and write down something like “Alphonse Alberghettini Doe” and let them twist in the wind until they get sick of their own criminality. Then when they send mail to “him” you can truthfully answer that there is no such “person” living at your address.

Run that little paragraph (above) three times in the local papers and save the clippings for posterity so that if the rats try to bring any of their false claims against the baby you will already have public prior claim established. Get your family, friends and neighbors to come to a birthday party when the baby is actually born and have them sign and seal (with thumbprints) documents attesting to the fact that he is your natural born son and his name is and his nativity occured on such and such a day to their certain knowledge and that they all agree and attest to these facts before God and Man.

For children who are already born and who have already been “claimed” by this System, just adapt the same process of publication, recording, and witnessing, using real birthdates as part of your documentation. Do NOT just sit around and let their claims stand unrebutted and unchallenged and do NOT just appear to “agree” to any of their nonsense. Resist, rebut, object, and counter-claim; your children belong to you, not some funky “governmental services corporation” run by goons like Jacob Rothschild. Realize the outrageous criminal things that these banks operating “governmental service corporations” have done and gotten away with and never, ever let them place any surreptitious “ownership claim” against your children.

Same thing with “applying for” a Social Security Number for your children. Refuse to do it. If they don’t like it, fine. At least they won’t be able to steal from your children under false pretenses and with any luck at all, by the time it really matters, enough Americans will have stepped to the plate and put an end to this vicious economic tyranny and fraud.

Read More

The Legal System Is A Military-Merchant-Postal System

Military force, or organised violence, is the crudest system of control. Human history is written in the blood of wars fomented by psychotic tyrants, monarchs, and bankers.

Empire building and international commerce has been backed by military power, and by the control of the sea as a priority. British colonialism was advanced under the Admiralty's military ensign, signaling the jurisdiction of the Crown on the High Seas. The Admiralty Jurisdiction applied to commercial contracts on the High Seas where the Crown was a party, while Maritime Jurisdiction applied to contracts on the High Seas not involving the Crown. But over the centuries, the distinction has faded, and Admiralty Jurisdiction has moved onto the land via navigable rivers and lakes, eventually dominating the King's Equity and Common Law jurisdictions.

Thus, the Crown's Admiralty Jurisdiction has been gradually applied to the entire “sea of commerce”, comprising all ships, colonies, and commerce within the British Empire/Crown, and by contract Admiralty Jurisdiction has also been applied to all those consenting to trade with the British Empire/Crown anywhere in the world.

In matters of empire, money, and war, it was essential for the Crown to control the High Seas by any means. Queen Elizabeth, in 1577, chose Sir Francis Drake to lead an expedition around South America. Drake acted as a privateer, with official approval to benefit himself and the queen as well as to cause the maximum damage to the Spaniards. The Golden Hind, Drake's flagship, was later depicted on British coins. As money became synonymous with Admiralty Jurisdiction, coins, postage stamps, and war posters were emblazoned with ships and empire building emblems and slogans, eventually including 'Britannia Rules The Waves'. Britannia, a goddess of war armed with a trident and shield, became an emblem of British imperial power. Britannia first appeared on English coins on a farthing in 1672.

By the mid-1700's, the Crown was at the height of its power, but was also indebted to the bankers, such that it was a willing party to any mutually profitable arrangement with merchants, brokers, bankers, and privateers. Matters of empire increasingly became matters of plunder and profit, further embedding vested interests in the functions of the Crown. It was not unusual for ships to be lost at sea, so insurance carriers saw to it that their limitations of liability were codified into the Crown's Statutes, as “special interest group” legislation. In this way, the Crown's Statutes came to be dominated by commerce, serving the wealthy and influential elite.

The European bankers, operating behind the scenes, reaped enormous profits from international commerce under the protection of the Crown's Admiralty Jurisdiction. With remarkably ingenuity, they devised ways to establish their “system” around the world, causing others to be bound by its codes. To maximise profits, they set up numerous companies using fictitious names that were registered into the system as corporate entities. Notably, under Admiralty Jurisdiction, any existing appellation or name can also be brought into the system by registering a fictional proxy – and by this deception entire nations were “incorporated”.

By subterfuge and war, backed by the Crown, the elites spread their Admiralty Jurisdiction across the land of one nation after another, installing in each a Central Bank to impose bankruptcy by compound interest, and a Bar Association (British Crown Commercial Company) to infiltrate the legislature and the courts.

In the united States of America, the Admiralty Jurisdiction was extended over the land when the Coast Guard surveyed the entire continental united States in 1938, legally “submerging” the land. That same year, the Erie Railroad Co. vs Tompkins decision in the Supreme Court overturned the Common Law Jurisdiction in federal courts. While in Australia, the continent legally came under Admiralty Jurisdiction with the Seas and Submerged Lands Act in 1973.

As the “system” became globalised during the 1800's, dependable communication was increasingly required to facilitate centralised governance for the extraction of the “common wealth”. The Universal Postal Union was established in 1874 with its headquarters in Berne, Switzerland. The UPU is essentially a global postal system for commerce in the Admiralty Jurisdiction, with its own governing “Acts” and service protocols. At the conclusion of WW2, the UPU became a member of the United Nations 'family'.

The Admiralty Jurisdiction combined with the UPU, codified in Statutes and international treaties, can be described as the current global “legal system” of commerce, with its highest form of delivery as the UPU.

Importantly, the “legal system” is specifically for artificial entities in what is a fictional in personam system of commerce. In short, it is not for living people, but fictional “persons”.

Today, the connection between commerce and the sea is reflected in words that relate to all commerce, such as transport, shipping, and citizenship. While references to military command are found in supposedly non-military Western governments, which have various “Generals”.

Every nation that is a member of the UPU has a Postmaster-General commanding its delivery protocols. Other military command positions within the Admiralty Jurisdiction include; Governor-General, Attorney-General, Solicitor-General, Surgeon-General, Auditor-General, Surveyor-General, Secretary-General, Director-General, and Commander-In-Chief. Although these titles may seem antiquated or ceremonial, they are reserved for the key positions of State within Western governance structures.

The entire “legal system” is an artificial construct for the purpose of facilitating commerce and the control of commerce. To make use of this system, it is necessary to register a legal fiction entity, such as a company, corporation, or trust, as a member. This corporate entity is often legally described as an “artificial person”, or simply a “person”.

If a man or woman contracts into the fictional world of commerce without declaring their factual “standing”, they are “acting” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person”, existing only in the imaginary system of Admiralty Jurisdiction. When “joinder” occurs by deception, it is a crime of “personage”, and when a false claim is brought into a court it is a crime of “barratry” - a crime appropriately named after the Bar Association.

The State can create and issue a new “person” by “registration”, which is a process of “legalisation”. The usual “legalisation” processes are “registration”, “certification”, “licensing”, “securitisation”, and “general deposit.” By these processes, the State creates commercial property over which it obtains a controlling “security interest”, afterward administering its contracts, and its “persons”, with various codes, rules, regulations, and acts prescribed by legislators in Statutes. The overarching codification of legal fiction commerce is the Universal Commercial Code (U.C.C.), governing all international trade between fictional corporate bodies.

Public servants commit the crime of “personage” by registering a fictional proxy of a baby's appellation, without disclosure. The fictional NAME is a “vessel” on the “sea of commerce” under Admiralty Jurisdiction. If the vessel's Master (MR/MRS/MISS) fails to claim their “vessel” and is still missing after seven years, they are “lost at sea”. The “vessel” is salvaged and the property (real/body/soul) is placed in a foreign estate trust, with the State as the “beneficiary”. Consequently, a man or woman ignorant of their “standing” as a living “beneficiary” will forfeit their property into a deceased estate simply by “acting” in “joinder” to the NAME of the “vessel”, which is also a “person”.

Every “person” is a “member of the public” simply because anything “of” the government is “public”. Whereas, any man or woman who retains their sovereign standing in the Common Law is “private”. The logical order of jurisdiction is: Nature > Man/Woman > Government > Person.

The presumption of “joinder” to a “person” can be rebutted by a living man or woman on paper by making an “autograph”, instead of a “signature” which is only made by a “corporate officer” acting in a legal fiction role. An “autograph” is in proper grammatical Common Law format, punctuated as a fact: John-Henry: Doe, and includes an expressed unambiguous declaration, such as “all rights reserved”, “without prejudice”, or “non-negotiable autograph.” Traditionally, it is made in red ink, indicating the “Law of the Land”, as opposed to the blue ink of the “Law of the Sea”. It can include a red ink thumbprint, and a family seal. A living man or woman may also expressly declare themselves to be the “authorised representative”, or the “authorised agent” “for” the “person”, thereby rebutting the presumption of “joinder”.

The Admiralty Jurisdiction, or the “Law of the Sea”, refers to all matters concerning “legal fictions”, while the Common Law Jurisdiction, or the “Law of the Land”, refers to all matters concerning “lawful facts”.

Since military communication is codified, and corporate entities are fictions, the Admiralty Jurisdiction is a codified system of “legal fiction” requiring interpretation using an obscure language, sometimes called “Legalese”. The codifications are universally prescribed in the Universal Commercial Code (U.C.C.), and are supplemented nationally by Statutes. Legal codes are numerous and complex, and are often altered or replaced, while the definitions of words in legal dictionaries are deceptive and changeable. Codes, by definition, preserve secrecy and require deciphering.

Within the “legal system”, commercial disputes can be resolved using a “dispute resolution service” for parties consenting to “act” in “joinder” to legal fiction “persons” of one kind or another in the Admiralty Jurisdiction. This “service” comprises “administrative courts” and various “tribunals”, none of which are convened with a properly constituted jury as in the Common Law Jurisdiction. Just like a military “hearing”, an “administrative court” does not have jury.

The “administrative courts” reflect their maritime roots in their layout and fittings. By tradition, the courtroom is divided into two parts by a barrier known as the “bar”, resembling a ships railing. When someone crosses the “bar” they enter the Admiralty Jurisdiction of the court, often signaled by a flag. In the corporate “United States”, this jurisdiction is signaled by a gold-fringed flag, which is a military ensign, whereas the flag of the constitutional “united States of America” is not gold-fringed. In an “administrative court” one or more judges presides from a bench - Latin for “bank”, and the accused “vessel” is placed in a “dock”.

Because these courts are commercial hearings, the objective is to “settle the account” and extract fees, which is only possible when someone is willing to “act” in “joinder” to a “person”, at which point the “legal fiction” will “appear” in the court. A factual man or woman is not visible in this fictional jurisdiction, where there are “no fixed rules of law or evidence”. “Persons” provide “surety” in the debt-money system, which explains why they are systematically created, and why indebted States need them to “appear” in the “administrative courts”.

In order for a fictional “person” to “appear” in an “administrative court” it is necessary to “summon” a “person” as if from the ether using the magic of “legalese”. Historically, a Judge wearing a black robe is a “High Priest of Ba'al” in the temple of Ba'al, enforcing Babylonian Talmudic Law. The Judge, or the “Black Robed Devil”, requires an offering from those who “appear” in the temple. The word “bailiff” derives from “ba'al”, for the “bailiff” is the servant of the “High Priest of Ba'al”. The Black's Law Dictionary, in this context, is a book of black magic.

According to scriptures, the worship of Ba'al was established in ancient Babylon in the Tower of Babel. The priests of Ba'al made burnt offerings to the sun-god under the title of “Ba'al”, or “Lord”, and on extraordinary occasions human victims were offered to Ba'al, as they were also to the sun. Today, some buildings significant to global finance and governance bear a striking resemblance to the Tower of Babel, including the Tower of Basel, the headquarters of the Bank For International Settlements, in Basel, Switzerland.

In summary, empire builders have sought to centralise their power and extract the “common wealth”, by establishing:

• a system of military protection and enforcement (Admiralty / Maritime jurisdiction),
• a system of merchant accounting and settlement (the Law Merchant jurisdiction) with “administrative courts” to settle disputes, and lastly
• a system of global communication and delivery (the Universal Postal Union).

These systems have merged to form a global economic power structure including military protocols and language.

This combination of military, merchant, and postal systems, can simply be described as today's “legal system” of commerce, with its highest from of delivery as the UPU.

In essence, the “legal system” extracts the “commercial energy” of living people via the “debt-money system”, using “administrative courts” to settle accounts between fictional parties.

Without exception, the “legal system” is an artificial construct, with membership requiring a process of “fictionalisation”, or “incorporation”.

Since “the system”, withal, is built largely on military protocols, it is no surprise that as a system of racketeering and control, it operates with military efficiency.

Nevertheless, as is sadly evident in world events, the physical war system of the military industrial complex is still the most immediate and persuasive control strategy.

Read More

Who Controls The Money Controls The World

The Tower of Babel, and the Tower of Basel, headquarters of the Bank for International Settlements.

Money is a medium of exchange, or token, that facilitates the trade of value beyond direct barter. Since money is a community invention used by consensus, its issuance and volume must be controlled by the community, or the nation, that uses it.

Issuance and volume are the critical elements of any money system.

Sovereign issuance ensures that it remains debt free, and limiting the volume ensures that it remains a valuable medium of exchange.

Money also serves as a unit of accounting, and it can be useful as a store of value, although a healthy money system needs its medium of exchange to circulate, remaining as liquid as possible.

It is a corruption of money to create it as debt.

• Money. In the usual and ordinary acceptation it means coins and paper currency used as circulating medium of exchange, and does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal or real estate. - Blacks Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

It is a further corruption of money to create it as interest-bearing debt.

“Money was intended to be used in exchange, but not to increase at interest.

And this term interest, which means the birth of money from money, is applied to the

breeding of money … of all modes of getting wealth this is the most unnatural.” 

- Aristotle 325BC The Story of Philosophy, quoted by Will Durant (L.1258B4).

A money system can only function properly when the supply of money issued and circulating is kept at a stable volume. Inflating and deflating the money supply causes boom and bust cycles, both of which in a privatised system benefits the private banker, who either profits from more interest-bearing debt (boom), or profits from more foreclosures (bust).

“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry

and commerce...and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation

and depression originate.” - James A. Garfield, assassinated president of the United States.

A sovereign nation, by definition, has the prerogative to issue its own money without debt. But throughout history sovereign nations have been enslaved by allowing their money supply to be issued by private bankers as interest-bearing debt, thereby corrupting the medium of exchange and ultimately destroying their economies.

“Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the

nations laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognised as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.” - William Lyon Mackenzie King.

In a debt-based economy, interest-bearing debt and deposit interest are constantly extracting unearned income from the economy. Exponential debt demands exponential productivity, which is not possible, hence the pressure to transfer productive wealth to unproductive wealth through speculation.

The cost of interest is embedded in the cost of all money and all goods and services. Interest-bearing debt functions as a hidden redistribution mechanism, constantly transferring money upward, causing growing income inequality. A money system that generates social polarization will eventually undermine any democracy.

By controlling both the issuance and volume of a nation's money supply, the private banking cabal can exercise the power of the master over the slave, subjecting a nation and its people to debt peonage. The “borrower” is always a “servant” to the “lender”.

Ultimately, the system is mathematically guaranteed to collapse, simply because the interest, which is not created, compounds exponentially, requiring ever more debt to service existing debt. The historic response is a debt jubilee (debt forgiveness) and some kind of system re-boot.

“It’s the compounding of interest and increasing indebtedness in both the private and the public sectors that is the primary driver of economic growth. But this growth misallocates resources and prevents the emergence of a sustainable and equitable economy. Like a cancer, the political, interest-based, debt-money system destroys the environment, corrupts democratic processes, increases disparities of power and wealth, and shreds the fabric of society.” - Thomas Greco. 

This is why rare commodities, especially gold and silver, have traditionally been used as money, or to back money, limiting the amount of new money that can be created as interest-bearing debt, and thereby providing more stability and longevity.

However, the Gold Standard did not prevent the 1929 crash and the Great Depression of the 1930's. This is because the private banking cabal was still able to restrict the volume, and therefore the velocity, of money in circulation, effectively starving the markets of liquidity, and the people of work and food.

The Great Depression was caused by market manipulation intended to precipitate the foreclosure of indebted nations, capturing wealth and power. Consequently, due to the pending bankruptcy in 1933, all privately held gold coins and bullion in America were seized via Executive Order on April 5, 1933, to benefit the false “creditor”, the private Federal Reserve Corporation under the terms of the bankruptcy. Congress - still convening strictly under Executive Order authority - confirmed the bankruptcy through the Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause, June 5, 1933, House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192, June 5, 1933, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, Public Law 73-10. Obviously, a nation that is bankrupt, albeit falsely, is vulnerable to foreclosure by the banks. Subsequent to the events of 1933, every Central Bank government has been technically, or effectively, trading in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and using “bankruptcy scrip” in a debt-money system.

Importantly, the private means of true payment was withdrawn on June 5, 1933, after which the people were obliged to use banker's debt-money scrip. Eventually, on August 15, 1971, Richard Nixon closed “the gold window”, ending the ability of Central Bank governments to be paid for debt in gold. Consequently, since 1971, it has been impossible to “pay” our alleged collective debts within the international debt-based system. Obviously, a debt cannot be paid with another debt. There is no “payment”. It is only possible to “discharge” a debt, or to “settle” an account, with a “promise to pay”.

The Federal Reserve Act 1913, the bankruptcy events of 1933, and the Bretton Woods agreements of 1944, established the U.S. Dollar as the global reserve currency, and strengthened and expanded the Central Bank system under the Bank for International Settlements (B.I.S) and the International Monetary Fund (I.M.F.). Having established a global fiat money system, removing gold from the people, the banking cabal was able to more easily increase the supply of debt-money, manipulate markets, and invent new classes of debt instruments.

Of course, the private banking cabal required “collateral” and “surety” to back their debt system.

The 1933 “bankruptcy scrip” was issued in return for Government obligations. Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, stated that “Under the new law, the money is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and bankers acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” As a result, the real property, wealth, assets and productive labour of the people was henceforward pledged by the Government as a Surety against the national debt. This was a process of hypothecation by stealth, using the people's “commercial value”, without their consent, as collateral for the State. This “credit of the nation” has become the Surety for trade within and between all central bank nations, which collectively serve the banking administrators.

Hypothecation.

1. Banking. Offer of stocks, bonds, or other assets owned by a party other than the borrower as collateral for a loan, without transferring title. If the borrower turns the property over to the lender who holds it for safekeeping, the action is referred to as a pledge. If the borrower retains possession, but gives the lender the right to sell the property in event of default, it is a true hypothecation.
2. Securities. The pledging of negotiable securities to collateralize a broker’s margin loan. The broker pledges the same securities to a bank as collateral for a broker’s loan, the process is referred to as re-hypothecation.' [Dictionary Of Banking Terms, Fitch, pg. 228 (1997)]

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading [Birth Certificate] to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”  [Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President 1913-1921)]

Governments have no rights over living people without their consent, (because that which is created by the people cannot be greater than the people), so the 1933 “New Deal” required a legal device to gain jurisdiction over the commercial value of the people. That device is registration, with which a man or a woman can be contracted (subject to their consent which can be silence) to become Surety for the State. When a child is born, the hospital sends the original of the “record of live birth” (not a copy) to the government, which uses it to create a Birth Certificate Bond in a styled version of the baby's true given name(s) and family name , i.e. JOHN HENRY DOE, which is a Trust/Estate. The Birth Certificate Bond is registered as a Security, which the Treasury uses as Surety for new Treasury securities such as Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills. Thus, the artificial legal “person” NAME becomes a proxy, or “strawman”, to extract the commercial value of the living man or woman.

• Straw man. A “front”; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. [Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p 1421]
• Cer-tif-i-cate, noun. Middle English certificate, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin ceruficatum. from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3: a document evidencing ownership or debt. [Merriam Webster Dictionary (1998)]
• Security. 1. a: Something (as a mortgage or collateral) that is provided to make certain the fulfillment of an obligation. Example: used his property as security for a loan. l. b: "surety." 2: Evidence of indebtedness, ownership, or the right to ownership. -- Ibid.
• Bond. 1. a: A usually formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to perform a certain act (as fulfill the obligations of a contract). ... with the condition that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person ... to pay a sum of money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety. 1. b: One who acts as a surety. 2: An interest-bearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need. -- Ibid.
• Surety. The person who has pledged him or herself to pay back money or perform a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral, and as part of the original contract. [Duhaime's Law Dictionary] 1: a formal engagement (as a pledge) given for the fulfillment of an undertaking. 2: one who promises to answer for the debt or default of another. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, however, a surety includes a guarantor, and the two terms are generally interchangeable. [Merriam Webster's “Dictionary of Law” (1996)]
• Guarantor. A person who pledges collateral for the contract of another, but separately, as part of an independent contract with the obligee of the original contract. [Duhaime's Law Dictionary]

The registration of birth, which creates the Birth Certificate, converts the lawful and true name of the child, into the NAME of a fictional legal “person” Trust, so that the State can obtain legal title, commercial Surety, and jurisdiction thereby. The Birth Certificate brings the NAME into colorable Admiralty Maritime Law, the same way a ship/vessel in commerce is berthed.

Since the NAME is a Trust/Estate, any living man or woman unknowingly in “joinder” to the NAME becomes “surety” for the liabilities of the Trust/Estate, as a Trustee or “accommodation party” Debtor.

Whereas every living man or woman with a publicly registered “person” Trust/Estate, is in fact a Beneficiary and a Guarantor for their nation, able to register as a Secured Party Creditor, or otherwise claim living standing as Grantor / Agent / Executor / Beneficiary / Heir to the JOHN HENRY DOE Trust/Estate.

Ultimately, money is simply “human energy” backed by Nature. It is the “water of life”; it is “charged” and “discharged”; it “flows” as “currency”; it has “liquidity” and “velocity”, and it “circulates” like blood.

When a nation, or community, surrenders its sovereign power to create money without debt or interest, a deadly economy is inevitable due to the cumulative toxic consequences of interest-bearing debt.

In summary, the debt-money system in which money is created as interest-bearing-debt is an extreme corruption of money. Debts eventually compound exponentially, reducing nations to debt peonage while causing global environmental destruction. Interest-bearing-debt insidiously transfers wealth upward from those who have the least to those who have the most. And every man or woman who unwittingly consents to “joinder” to an “artificial person”, becomes a debtor and “surety” for the system, bonded in debt-slavery.

The debt-slavery formulae is: Scarcity > Dependence > Control

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money
and its issuance.” - President James Madison.

Read More

If You Don't Control Your Mind, Someone Else Will

Since prehistory, mind control has been the sinister art of the psychopath, sociopath, narcissist, and megalomaniac. Those who crave power have learned that the most efficient slavery is not achieved by capturing the body of the slave, but their mind.

Humankind instinctively forms communities to cooperate for mutual benefit, and for this reason most people accept leadership as a natural condition. This “herd mentality” can be insidiously exploited, because by capturing the leadership in the institutional power centres of a society, of a nation, of the world, its entire population can be socially engineered.

Societies, then, become populations of “human resources” in which people are reduced to human capital, or “livestock”, to be managed as if on a farm. On this planetary farm, the human “livestock” are programmed by both psychological and technological inputs.

The social engineers never question that they have a right to rule - by a divine providence, a superior eugenic bloodline, and a superhuman intelligence. They advance their plans by secrecy, deception, and lies, because from their elevated perspective their vision of a world government by “collectivism” is a godly craft requiring hidden powers and the morality of war. The ensuing death of countless people is not only “collateral damage”, but necessary depopulation. In this secret war, the “ends justifies the means”, and “out of chaos, comes order” - their order, a “New World Order”.

By dominating societal knowledge, including childhood and higher education, book publishing, the mainstream news media, popular entertainment, technical research and innovation, and patents and copyrights, the global elite have been able to construct an alternative reality.

Indoctrination begins with a class-based education system which programmes conformity and obedience from an early age. Behaviour modification is achieved with Pavlovian “classic conditioning”iv using positive and negative reinforcement. The desired response is rewarded. The undesired response is punished. Children become non-questioning adult workers and consumers, while university graduates become their professional minders.

Classic conditioning suppresses individuality, self-determination, independence, free-thinking, creativity, rational observation, and a sense of autonomy – everything that makes people human – a capacity for self-realisation, a desire to create and evolve, a perception of values and wisdom, and an endless curiosity and fascination with nature and the world, without any of which there is no humanity, only mindless slavery.

Throughout society, compliance to institutional authority is constantly reinforced by officialdom, breeding a fearful culture in which questioning the status quo is confrontational, and critical-thinking is almost eliminated.

A daily stream of conflicting information undermines reality, leading to “cognitive dissonance” - a psychological tension arising from contrary beliefs that makes it easier to modify thoughts. The transition between paradigms is disturbing, often causing violence - a pretext for more suppression.

The psychological weaponry includes the often used Hegelian Dialectic, or Problem > Reaction > Solution, in which the social engineers “create a problem”, “manufacture a reaction”, and “provide a solution”. In this way, a peaceful society can be turned to war, freedom can be protected by sacrificing rights in a police state, and any resistance to the narrative can be dangerous.

Resistance to control is instinctive, but when resistance is constantly punished to the point of futility, the mind is reduced to a state of “learned helplessness” in which resistance stops because punishment is normal. “Learned helplessness” is a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder that switches off the conscious mind as a coping strategy. The mind under relentless stress accepts what is irrational. In this false reality “public servants have authority over the people they serve”, “debt is money and a debt can be paid with another debt”, “fictional entities such as corporations have the rights of living people”, and “endless economic growth in a finite world is possible regardless of the exponential function of compound interest”.

The only defense to mind control is to dismiss what is false by seeking what is real, through critical examination, and by ASKING QUESTIONS.

“Until you know who you are, and really what you are, you are out of control.

You're hurtable and manipulatable, and that's just a fact.” - Joe Marshalla.

The quality of your life is based on the questions you ask. And until you ask who am I, what am I, because everything about mind control is about taking you away from yourself, from your point of view, and your point of view is sacred, and it is your birthright, and your birthright has been stripped from you, and your birthright has been influenced, and your mind has been hijacked by ideas and thoughts leading you to, really, unconscious behaviours.One gains peace of mind when one gains certainty. Fear is letting go of the known. FEAR - FANTISED EVENTS APPEARING REAL

Subservience is also ingrained in society through the manipulation of language, because words express beliefs, and false words create false beliefs. “Legalese”, the codified language of the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction, systematises many de-powering words, such as “submission”, “application”, “petition”, “appeal”, “plea”, and “request”. These are the words of a servant, and in a legal context they establish a diminished jurisdictional status. Whereas sovereign men and women in the Common Law jurisdiction establish their “standing” by using words such as “notice”, “order”, “demand”, “verification”, and “require”.

In addition, numerous technological inputs are used to control the behaviour, productivity, health (physical and mental), fertility, and longevity of the “livestock”, including modified foods, prescribed drugs, laced vaccinations, electromagnetic fields and frequencies, and toxic water, soil, and air. The controlability and usefulness of the herd is enhanced by keeping it generally in a condition of malnutrition, dumbed down and pacified, divided against each other, and occupied with trivialities.

A global network of inter-dependant industries has been developed to manage the “livestock” efficiently. The cancer industry needs a steady supply of victims and is supported by the modified food, pharmaceutical and advertising industries. The illegal drug industry needs a thriving black market to keep the private prison industry well stocked, and is supported by the entertainment, military, and legal industries. While the war industry needs cycles of death and destruction to maintain the military industrial complex, and is supported by the banking, energy, and mainstream media industries, and so on.

More sinister are the secret programmes such as “MKUltra” that create special purpose mental slaves by subjecting young victims to mind-altering hypnosis, drugs, and repeated trauma that fractures the mind producing split personalities serving different functions. The elites have learned that scarring the brain stem produces a photographic memory, producing mental slaves for living data storage and retrieval.

Altogether, a network of global corporate control manages the planetary farm, directing the flow of “commercial energy”, operating a centralised system of theft and coercion (debt-money and legislation).

How the “commercial energy” of the people is harvested is perhaps the master stroke of the elite. This is because they have codified the artificial world of “legal fiction” commerce so insidiously that free men and women walk into it unawares, as if into a debtor's prison. It is a simple matter of ensuring their incapacity.

To achieve absolute control over a sovereign man or woman it is necessary to remove their “private capacity” in the Common Law jurisdiction by transferring them into an inferior “public capacity” in the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction, ultimately administered by the elite class.

Sovereigns are born endowed with Unalienable Rights antecedent to the State, so the only way they can lose those rights is by exercising their unlimited right to contract.

A constitutional government created by sovereign people cannot define the rights of its creators, whom it serves. But a government can register and regulate artificial legal “persons”, and thereby control its own “creatures of the State” with statutory contracts in the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction. A man or woman who consents, freely or unwittingly, to “act” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” is an “accommodation party” contracted to serve in a “public capacity” controlled by the issuing authority, the State.

The international banking cabal has captured Western nations through indebtedness, imposing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the 1930s. In this debt-money system, the liability for the national debt has been transferred to the people via the artificial legal “persons” created by the State on the Birth Certificate, which is a bond.

Whenever a baby is born the State insists on registering a legal “person” by combining the baby's Given name with its Family name. This NAME is a registered member of the Universal Postal Union, and anyone who uses such a NAME consents to the codes, rules, regulations, and acts of legal commerce under the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction.

Of course, the baby's parents are not consulted, and so the child grows up associating the dead corporate entity NAME such as – JOHN HENRY ADAMS with its living Common Law name such as – John-Henry: of the family Adams. But a contract is not valid unless consent is given knowingly, willingly, and with full disclosure, so the corporate entity is established by fraud. The NAME trick is called “mirroring” and it is the most important deception because it provides the banking cabal with legal control via the captured State. This legal control is essential for the “harvesting” of “commercial energy” using the debt-money system.

The debt-slavery formulae is: Scarcity > Dependence > Control

The State places the NAME on endless offers of contract to whoever will consent to take responsibility for the liabilities of the NAME, offering various “benefits” and “privileges” which associated fees, levies, penalties, fines, and taxes. Moreover, in the legal system, consent can be procured by any submission to presumed authority, and even by silence.

“Sub-sulentio” Under silence, without any notice being taken. Passing a thing sub silentio may be evidence of consent. - [Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p 1593]

“Mirroring” the NAME converts free men and women into unwitting debt slaves and burdens them with unseen adhesion contracts for the benefit of their parasitic masters. By such trickery, the “livestock” is farmed.

“The ideal tyranny is that which is generally self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.” - Dresden James.

Finally, knowing oneself – the truth in one's heart and soul, is the only counter to slavery by deception. We instinctively know that no man or woman is born as our master. Accordingly, we should also know that the origin of all legal jurisdiction over a man or woman is their consent, given knowingly or unknowingly.

Read More